H.p. State Pollution Control Board v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Apr 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
H.p. State Pollution Control Board v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.p. State Pollution Control Board v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the Petitioners: Mr.
Decision: There is no error apparent on the face of the record, as such, the review petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s) if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. Review No. 167/2010
Decided on:April,20,2011
H.P. State Pollution Control Board VERSUS
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
.....Petitioner.
.....Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, J.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For Respondent: Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, vice counsel.
Rajiv Sharma, J (Oral)
CMP (M) No 1513/2011
In view of the grounds taken in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the delay in filing the civil review is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
C. Review No. 167/2010
Heard. There is no error apparent on the face of the record, as such, the review petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s) if any. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that SLP has been preferred by the petitioner against the CWP No. 2066/2009 decided on 7[th] December, 2009, rendered by this Court and the same has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
( R.B. Misra ), J.
( Rajiv Sharma), J.
20[th] April 2011 (sl)
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue