Hrishikesh Roy, J v. M/S. Shivani Ispat And Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd
High Court
10 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Hrishikesh Roy, J v. M/S. Shivani Ispat And Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Hrishikesh Roy, J v. M/S. Shivani Ispat And Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA 119/2017BEFOREHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
(Hrishikesh Roy, J)
This Appeal relates to the claim of income tax exemption for the transport subsidy amount received by the assessee. The departmental authorities declared that the assessee is entitled to exemption to tax under Section 80-IB and 80-IC of theIncome Tax Act and that is how, the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) has filed this Appeal, under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act.Today when the case is listed for admission, Mr. S. Sharma, the learned standingcounsel for the Department produced the recent judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. reported in (2016) 383 ITR 0217 (SC), to project that the issue about deduction of tax on account of transport subsidy is finally decided by the Supreme Court in favour of the assessee. Therefore adjudication of this Appeal is contended to be unnecessary and the departmental lawyer fairly submits that this Appeal should be dismissed on account of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court, in the Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Supra). In view of the above submission made by the standing counsel of the Income Tax Department and having regard to the ratio in Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (Supra), we order dismissal of the Appeal.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.