Case LawHigh Court › Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcserv...

Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices v. Assistant Registrar(Cs Iv

High Court 10 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices v. Assistant Registrar(Cs Iv
Date of order
10 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices v. Assistant Registrar(Cs Iv, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the prayer sought for is rejected and theWrit Petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

21[st] Century TransportsRep. by its Partner,Mr.A.Shahjahan,No.F/201, Kailash Complex,Park site, Vikhroli (W),Mumbai 400 079....PetitionerVs. 1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward V (4), Chennai. 2. Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Rep. by its Secretary Department of Revenue Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. ...Respondents Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, for issuance of Writ of declaration, declaring theprovisions of Sec 83 of the Finance Act 2001, asunconstitutional and bad in Law and striking down the same asarbitrary and ultra vires Articles 19, 265 of the Constitutionof India. Heard Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner and Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned counselappearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The petitioner seeks for declaration to declare theprovisions of Section 83 of the Finance Act 2001, asunconstitutional. Section 251 of the Income Tax Act had beenamended by Finance Act, 2001. The same was examined by theHon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case ofDr.K.Nedunchezhian Vs. Dy. CIT of Income Tax Act (2005) 279 ITR0342 and it is held that the appellate power includes all thepowers of the original authority and hence the appellant canraise all the points which he is urging before the Court in theWrit Appeals before the appellate authority. Therefore, thechallenge to the provisions of Section 251 of the Income Tax Acthas to necessarily fail. 3. Accordingly, the prayer sought for is rejected and theWrit Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to thepetitioner to challenge the order dated 21.12.2005 and theperiod during which, the Writ Petition was pending i.e., from31.06.2006 till the date of receipt of the certified copy ofthis order, shall be excluded while computing limitation. Nocosts. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nmmTo 1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward V (4), Chennai. 2. The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. +1 cc to M/s.Mallika Srinivasan Advocate sr 58045+1 cc to M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan Advocate sr 58019Writ Petition No.3164 of 2006 arivaa22/09/2017
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan