Ia No: 1 Of 2025 v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Ia No: 1 Of 2025 v. A. Siva Kartikeya
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ia No: 1 Of 2025 v. A. Siva Kartikeya, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOUR.ABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NO: 219 OF 2025
Between:Mrs Sandhya {o1{qO-qtly, D/o: Mr. G Malta Reddy, aged 57years,Occ. Business, 6-3-1099i 1/3,4,'121404, Aditya Classic, ['Raj ]["Bnavan]Road,Somajiguda, Hyderabad - 500 082 Telangana.
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Wflt of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order orDirection, declaring the order passed by the 1st Respondent, vide DIN andLetter No.- ITBA/RCV/F/1712024-2511070129177(1), dated Os.11.2024, indirecting the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 79,00,000/-. pending disposal of the
appeal of the Petitioner before the 1't [Appellate ][Authority. ][i.e ][, ][the ][4th]Respondent herein for the Assessment [Year ][2016 ][' ][17. ][as ][arbitrary, ][illegal,]barred by Iimitatiorr, bad in law, void-ab-initio. [violative of ][the ][principles ][of ][natural]justice, apart frorn being violative of Articles 14. 19(1 Xg) and [265 ][of ][the]Constitution of lnclia and Sec [148A ]of [the ][lncome ][Tax Act, ][1961, ][and]consequently set-aside the same [and grant stay ][of ][recovery. pending disposal ][of]the Petitioner's appeal [before ][the ][1st ][Appellate ][Authority, ][in the ][interests of]justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition unCer Section 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated]in the affidavit filecl in support of the [writ ][petition, ][the ][High Court may be ][pleased]to stay atl further ltroceedings, [including ][any ][recovery, pursuant ][to ][the ][order]passed by the 1st Respondent, vide DIN & Letter No.- ITBA/RCV|F|1712024-25t'1070129177(1 ), dated 05.11.2024, in directing [the ][Petitioner ][to ][pay ][a ][sum ][of]Rs. 79,00,000/-, [pending ]disposal of the appeal [of the ][Petitioner before ][the ][1st]Appellate Authority. i.e., the 4th Respondent [herein, ][for the ][Assessment ][Year]2016 - 17, [pending rlisposal ]of the above Writ [Petition.]
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. V. A. SIVA KARTIKEYA
Counsel for the Res;pondents: MS. BOKARO (Jr. SC FOR INCOME TAX)
The Court made tlte following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE
AND
THE IION'BLE [DT, ] [G. RADHA RANI]WRIT PETITI[ON No.][2L9][ of2o25]
ORDER [(Per ][Hon'ble ][SP,J)]
Sri A.V-A' [Siva ][Kartikeya' learned counsel ][for ][the]petitioner [and Ms' ][B' ][Sapna Reddy' learned ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel [for ][Income Tax ][Department' for the ][respondents']
2With the [consent {inallY ][heard']
3. karned [counsel ][for the parties ][agreed ][that this ][petition]be [disposed ][of ][in ][terms ][of ][order ][passed ][by a ][Coordinate]may Bench [of ][this ][Court ][in ][W'P'No'2526O ][of ][2024']
A Coordinate [Bench ][of this ][Court ][in ][aforesaid]
4A Coordinate W.P.No.2526O [ol ][2024 ][recorded ][as ][under:]
"6. The [contention ][of ][the ][learned counsel ][for ][the]so [far ][as ][the ][148 notice ][issued ][by ][the].i".i,i.".. ffi#:;; e,"".""i.g [ollicer ][not ][being ][in ][dispute ][bv]d"""sel [for the ][Departrnent ][and]il'. t."t'd:;;;;-s ;i;^;;';h; [light ][of ][Ihe ][aforesaid ][judgments-rendered]bv this [Court ][in ][the ][case ][of ][Kankanala ][Ravindra ][Reddy]Ii";; l;;;J'," [tr'' ][Iisht ][of ][the ][judgment ][of ][the]E;Ifi"'b;;;,.,' [court"in ][case ][of ][Ashish ][Agarwal]i."r*'ri;;-.." or the [considered ][opinion ][that ][the])r"*'.,""f "i [Authority ][in ][the ][course ][of ][deciding ][the];.ffiffi";;s..do" [220(61 ][of ][the ][Act' ought ][to ][have]take a [more pragmatlc ][view'and should had kept ][the];";;";;';.;edfngs [in ][abevance' ][pending ][the ][appeal]b.fo." ifle [APPellate ][Authoriry']
7. For the aforesaid reasons, we dispose of the presentWrit Petition at this juncture direciing the aslessingOffict:r not to pursue with the .".ou.ry" p.o...ai"g" i.,ternrs;.of the impugned order dated ti.OA.ZOZC rlll ttreappeal for the Assessment year 2OlB_14 is Iinallydecided."
5.
5. In view of aforesaid order, this petition is disposed ofby directing ttre Assessing Officer not to pursue the recoveryproceedings i, terms of the impugned assessment order till thedecision of the appellate authorie. The appellate authorit5r shallmake endeavour to decide the appeal expeditiously. It is madeclear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the meritsof the case. No costs.
Interlocutory applications,
if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
HIGH COUR'T
DATED:0610112025
ORDER
WP.No.219 c,f 2025
1HE$'7.4 16:o0 o tttnn zuzs.L**t)rsPATCt\6O
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
{
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.