Case Law › High Court › Ia No: Ga/1/2024, Ga/2/2024 Income Tax O...

Ia No: Ga/1/2024, Ga/2/2024 Income Tax Officer, Ward 50 (1), Kolkata v. Arun Chaudhury

High Court 17 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_original_side

Parties

Date of order

17 Jan 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ia No: Ga/1/2024, Ga/2/2024 Income Tax Officer, Ward 50 (1), Kolkata v. Arun Chaudhury, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the application is dismissed and the appeal stands rejected. .

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE APOT/400/2024 IA NO: GA/1/2024, GA/2/2024 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 50 (1), KOLKATA VS ARUN CHAUDHURY BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : January 17, 2025. Appearance : Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Adv. …for appellants. Mr. Arun Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Shobha Upadhyay, Adv. …for respondent. The Court: - We have heard learned advocates on either side. There is a delay of 488 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay application and we find that there is absolutely no explanation for the delay which has occurred between December 2023 and November 2024. As there is no acceptable reason for inordinate delay, we are not persuaded to exercise any discretion in favour of the appellant. Accordingly, the application is dismissed and the appeal stands rejected. . (T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.