In Ia/1084/2021 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Godrej Investment Ltd, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Office objections, if any, to be removed within two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeal will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPURTIPRASADPARABINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1084 OF 2021Digitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABINDate: 2021.08.2511:21:29 +0530INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 137 OF 2020
Principal Commissioner of IncomeTax – 6….ApplicantIN THE MATTER BETWEENPrincipal Commissioner of IncomeTax – 6….Appellant V/s.Godrej Investment Ltd. …Respondent
----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Applicant/Appellant.Mr. A.K.Jasani for Respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATED : 23[rd] AUGUST 2021
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
P.C. :
1.Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar and also considered the application.
For reasons mentioned in the application and considering the submissionsmade, application is allowed. Delay is condoned.
2.Application accordingly stands disposed.
3.Office objections, if any, to be removed within two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeal will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
4.Appeal to come up for hearing in due course. The copy ofappeal shall also be served within two weeks from today.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.