Ia/1661/2023 Of Unni Krishnan Vadakkedath Sugathan v. Income Tax Officer International Tax Circle 4 3 1
High Court
04 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ia/1661/2023 Of Unni Krishnan Vadakkedath Sugathan v. Income Tax Officer International Tax Circle 4 3 1
Date of order
04 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ia/1661/2023 Of Unni Krishnan Vadakkedath Sugathan v. Income Tax Officer International Tax Circle 4 3 1, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: We, accordingly, allow the application and condone thedelay of 554 days.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1661 OF 2023
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 8587 OF 2023
…
Mr. Madhav Agrawal with Mr. Gautam Thacker i/b. Mr. Atul K. Jasani,for Applicant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for Respondents.
…
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATED : 4TH MAY 2023.
P.C. :
1.This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 554 daysin filing the present Income Tax Appeal. We have gone through theInterim Application and also heard the learned Counsel for theApplicant/appellant in this regard. Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Revenue, Mr. Kumar, states that he does not want to file any objections,but nevertheless opposed the condonation of delay.
2Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and having gonethrough the application seeking condonation of delay, we are of the
opinion that sufficient cause has been shown for the delay in filing thepresent appeal. We, accordingly, allow the application and condone thedelay of 554 days. The Interim Application is disposed of accordingly.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.)
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.