In Ia/172/2020 Of Piramal Glass Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7(3)(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2022.03.0710:50:59+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.172 OF 2020
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2718 OF 2019….Applicant/Appellant
Piramal Glass Private Limited
V/s.
The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax – 7(3)(2) ….Respondent
----
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for applicant/appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 25[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Jasani and also considered the reasons given in the
interim application. For reasons mentioned therein, the delay is condoned.
2Application accordingly disposed.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue