Ia/1740/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 3 v. M/S. Diamond R Us
High Court
25 Feb 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ia/1740/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 3 v. M/S. Diamond R Us
Date of order
25 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ia/1740/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - 3 v. M/S. Diamond R Us, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed1/1by GAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2022.02.28IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY12:53:07 +0530ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1740 OF 2019
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central - 3
….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
M/s. Diamond R US
….Respondent
----
Mr. A.K. Saxena for applicant/appellant.None for respondent.
---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 25[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Saxena and also considered the reasons given in the
interim application. For reasons mentioned therein, the delay is condoned.Appeal restored to file.
2Application accordingly disposed.
3Mr. Saxena states that a copy of this order alongwith copy ofthe appeal will be served on respondent and affidavit of service shall be filedwithin two weeks from today. Statement accepted as undertaking to thisCourt. It is made clear that if this undertaking is not complied with, theappeal will stand dismissed without further reference to this Court.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue