In Ia/1779/2019 Of Harry Inder Dhaul v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income - Tax - 12, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2022.03.0710:51:01+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1779 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2596 OF 2019
Harry Inder Dhaul
….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 12
….Respondent
----
Mr. S.C. Tiwari for applicant/appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 25[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1Mr. Tiwari states that the delay is of 423 days and due to an
oversight, it has been mentioned as 329 days in some portions of theapplication and requests that the error may be condoned.
2For reasons mentioned in the application, the delay iscondoned.
3Application disposed accordingly.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue