Case Law › High Court › Ia/2075/2019 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ia/2075/2019 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. Hitesh H Shah

High Court 25 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ia/2075/2019 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. Hitesh H Shah, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

GAURIAMITGAEKWAD Digitallysigned byGAURI AMIT1/1GAEKWADDate:2022.02.2812:53:47+0530IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2075 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3189 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 17 ….Applicant/Appellant V/s. Hitesh H. Shah ….Respondent ---- Mr. Suresh Kumar for applicant/appellant.None for respondent. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 25[th] FEBRUARY 2022 P.C. : 1Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar and also considered the reasons given in the interim application. For reasons mentioned therein, the delay iscondoned. Appeal restored to file. 2As regards substantial questions of law proposed in the appeal,Mr. Suresh Kumar states that the issue is squarely covered in the order dated11[th] February 2019 passed by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1004 of2016 and in the order dated 15[th] July 2019 passed by this Court in IncomeTax Appeal No.413 of 2017. 3Therefore, interim application as well as appeal stand disposed. (N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.