In Ia/2136/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Central-3 v. V. R. Construction P. Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned by1/1GAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2022.03.07IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY10:50:59+0530ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2136 OF 2019
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2509 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 3
….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
V.R. Construction P. Ltd.
….Respondent
----
Mr. A.K. Saxena for applicant/appellant.Ms. Neha Anchlia i/b. Agrud Partners for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 25[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Saxena and also considered the reasons given in the
interim application. For reasons mentioned therein, the delay is condoned.
Appeal restored to file.
2Application accordingly disposed.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue