In Ia v. Dy. Commof Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
VRJIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2240 OF 2022IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.616 OF 2011WITHINTERIM APPLICATION NO.2238 OF 2022
INWITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.614 OF 2011
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2239 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.615 OF 2011
Pinakin Kantilal Patel
V/s.
Dy. Comm of Income Tax & Anr.
… Applicant
… Respondents
Mr. Siddharth Jagushte for the applicant.
Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for the respondent/State.
P.C.:
CORAM :AMIT BORKAR, J.DATED:NOVEMBER 30, 2022
1.These applications seek amendment of the original criminal applications in relation to prayer clauses (a) and (c) to substitute new case number and Court.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the applications are allowed. Applicants to carry out amendment within two (2) weeks from today. No costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.