Case LawHigh Court › Ia/3346/2022 Of Pegasus Assets Reconstru...

Ia/3346/2022 Of Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-3, And 3 Ors

High Court 07 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ia/3346/2022 Of Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-3, And 3 Ors
Date of order
07 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ia/3346/2022 Of Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-3, And 3 Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitallysigned byPURTI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2023.11.0914:33:38+0530WRIT PETITION NO. 1067 OF 2022ALONGWITHINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3346 OF 2022IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1067 OF 2022 Pegasus Assets ReconstructionPrivate Limited ….Petitioner/Applicant V/s.Principal Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai – 3 and Ors.…Respondents ---- Mr. P. J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Harsh Kapadia and Mr. P. C. Tripathi i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma a/w Ms. Shilpa Goel for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATED : 7[th] NOVEMBER 2023 P.C. : INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3346 OF 2022 1.Mr. Sharma states prayer clause – (a) may be granted.Accordingly, Interim Application No. 3346 of 2022 stands disposed in terms of prayer clause – (a) which reads as under : (a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue appropriatedirections to the Respondents to the Writ Petition and thejurisdictional assessing officer of the Applicant, namely, DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax – Circle 3(2)(2), Mumbai to forthwithdispose of the Applicant’s rectification applications filed for AY2010-11, 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2020-21 and grant theconsequential refunds as prayed for in the respective rectificationapplication filed by the Applicant; and 2.As regards the main petition is concerned, stand over to 12[th] December 2023. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan