Ia/3641/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 6 Mumbai v. Tech Pacific India Limited
High Court
06 Dec 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ia/3641/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 6 Mumbai v. Tech Pacific India Limited
Date of order
06 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ia/3641/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 6 Mumbai v. Tech Pacific India Limited, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
PURTI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPRASADPARAB ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2023.12.0617:38:54 +0530(16) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3640 OF 2022 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 23829 OF 2022
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax – 6, Mumbai….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Tech Pacific India Limited
(Now known as Ingram Micro India Ltd.)…Respondent
AND(17) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3641 OF 2022 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 23841 OF 2022
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax – 6, Mumbai….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.Tech Pacific India Limited(Now known as Ingram Micro India Ltd.)…Respondent
----
Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Applicant/Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATED : 6[th] DECEMBER 2023
P.C. :
1.Both these Interim Applications are for condonation of delay of28 days and 30 days respectively. Having considered the reasons given in
the applications, delay is condoned.
2.
Both Interim Applications stand disposed.
3.Appeals to come up in due course.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue