Ia/446/2021 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7, Mumbai v. Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now Known As Piramal Glass Ltd.)
High Court
04 Aug 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ia/446/2021 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7, Mumbai v. Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now Known As Piramal Glass Ltd.)
Date of order
04 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ia/446/2021 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7, Mumbai v. Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now Known As Piramal Glass Ltd.), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeals will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.today, failing which, the appeals will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO.443 OF 2021IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2469 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai
….Appellant/Applicant
V/s.
Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now known asPiramal Glass Ltd.)…Respondent
WITHINTERIM APPLICATION NO.445 OF 2021ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2477 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai
V/s.
Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now known asPiramal Glass Ltd.)
….Appellant/Applicant
…Respondent
WITHINTERIM APPLICATION NO.446 OF 2021IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2478 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai….Appellant/Applicant
V/s.
Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now known asPiramal Glass Ltd.)
…Respondent
WITHINTERIM APPLICATION NO.450 OF 2021
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2468 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai….Appellant/Applicant
V/s.
Gujarat Glass Ltd. (Now known as Piramal Glass Ltd.)
…Respondent
----
Mr. Nirmal Chandra Mohanty for applicant/appellant. Mr. Atul Jasani for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATED : 4[th] AUGUST 2021
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Mohanty and also considered the applications. The reasons
are explained in the affidavits and we are satisfied with the explanations.
The delay is condoned.
2Applications accordingly stand disposed.
3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeals will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.today, failing which, the appeals will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue