In Ia/451/2021 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7,Mumbai v. Piramal Healthcare Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeals will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO.449 OF 2021
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2472 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-7
….Appellant/Applicant
V/s.
Piramal Healthcare Ltd.…Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.451 OF 2021
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2470 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-7
….Appellant/Applicant
V/s.Piramal Healthcare Ltd.…Respondent
----
Mr. Nirmal Chandra Mohanty for applicant/appellant.
None for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATED : 4[th] AUGUST 2021
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Mohanty and also considered the applications. The reasons
are explained in the affidavits and we are satisfied with the explanations.The delay is condoned.
2Applications accordingly stand disposed.
3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeals will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue