In Ia/503/2019 Of Reliance Infrastructure Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 14(3)(1), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURI AMIT1/1GAEKWADAMITDate:GAEKWAD2021.08.0316:27:51+0530IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 503 OF 2019
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2255 OF 2019
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd.
….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
The Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax 14 (3)(1)….Respondent
----
Mr. Madhur Agarwal a/w. Mr. Balalsaheb Yewale i/b. M/s. Rajesh Shah andCo. for applicant/appellant. None for respondent.
---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED : 2[nd] AUGUST 2021
P.C. :
1Heard the counsel for applicant and also considered theexplanation given in the application. The delay is condoned.
2Application accordingly stands disposed.
3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks
from today.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue