In Ia/890/2021 Of Siddhivinayak Homes v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO.889 OF 2021
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 864 OF 2013
M/s Siddhivinayak Homes
V/s.
….Appellant/Applicant
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12 …Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.890 OF 2021
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 865 OF 2013
M/s Siddhivinayak Homes
V/s.
….Appellant/Applicant
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12 …Respondent
----
Mr. K. Gopal i/b. Neha Paranjpe for applicant/appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATED : 12[th] AUGUST 2021
P.C. :
1Both the appeals be listed for hearing at the bottom of the board on
22[nd] September 2021.
2Both the interim applications stand disposed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue