In Ia/90/2020 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu) v. Reliance Industries Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURIAMITAMITGAEKWADGAEKWADDate:2022.03.0710:50:58+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2020IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.28 OF 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax, LTU ….Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Reliance Industries Limited
….Respondent----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for applicant/appellant.Mr. Madhur Agrawal a/w. Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/b. Mr. Raj Darak for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 25[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar and also considered the reasons given
in the interim application. For reasons mentioned therein, the delay iscondoned. Appeal restored to file.
2Application accordingly disposed.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue