Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/108/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Iapl/108/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kanpur v. M/S Grand International Kanpur

High Court 26 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/108/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kanpur v. M/S Grand International Kanpur
Date of order
26 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/108/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Kanpur v. M/S Grand International Kanpur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 108 of 2015 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax KanpurRespondent :- M/S Grand International KanpurCounsel for Appellant :- Dhananjay Awasthi S.C.,Piyush Agarwal,S.S.C. I.T. Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal,Surendra Kumar Garg Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Learned counsel for the Department statesthat in view of the new circulars issued bythe Government of India, the tax effectinvolved in this appeal is below monetarylimit. Sri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel forthe respondent is present. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the CircularNos.17/2019 of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),dated8.8.2019andF.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ,dated20.8.2019 Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes. Order Date :- 26.9.2019V.S.Singh
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan