Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/116/2019 Of Ajay Sharma v. Commissi...

Iapl/116/2019 Of Ajay Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another

High Court 27 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/116/2019 Of Ajay Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
27 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Iapl/116/2019 Of Ajay Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is liable to be dismissed and stands, accordingly,dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 116 of 2019 Appellant :- Ajay Sharma Respondent :- Commissioner Of Income Tax And AnotherCounsel for Appellant :- Abhishek Krishna,Govind KrishnaCounsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,Shubham Agarwal Hon'ble Biswanath Somadder,J.Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. This is an appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 taken out by one Ajay Sharma against a judgment andorder dated 7[th] June, 2019, passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Varanasi Circuit Bench, Varanasi. By the impugned judgment and order, the appeal of the assesseewas allowed and the matter was remanded before theCommissioner, Income Tax (Appeals) for deciding the sameafresh after giving opportunity of hearing to the assessee andafter considering the affidavit furnished by the assessee beforethe Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals). A plain reading of the impugned judgment and order revealsthat before the learned Tribunal it was submitted by theauthorized representative of the assessee (being the appellantherein) that the affidavit submitted by the assessee before theappellate authority giving out the exact particulars of theagricultural income earned by the assessee was not consideredby him and that a proper opportunity was not given to theassessee to justify his claim. It was in view of such submissionmade by the authorised representative of the assessee that thematter was remanded to the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) for the interest of justice. We do not find any plausible or justifiable reason, in suchcircumstances as stated above, to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated 7[th] June,2019. The appeal is liable to be dismissed and stands, accordingly,dismissed. Order Date :- 27.11.2019Ravi / Vikram (Biswanath Somadder, J.) (Ajay Bhanot, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan