Case Law › High Court › Iapl/125/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Iapl/125/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Lucknow v. M/S Omega Infra Developers P Ltd. Lucknow

High Court 04 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cishclko

Parties

Date of order

04 Jan 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/125/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Lucknow v. M/S Omega Infra Developers P Ltd. Lucknow, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Court No. - 2 Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 125 of 2016Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii LucknowRespondent :- M/S Omega Infra Developers P Ltd. LucknowCounsel for Appellant :- Manish Misra,Kushagra Dikshit,Neerav Chitravanshi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 260-A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 against the judgment and order dated27.07.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Lucknow Bench 'B', Lucknow in Income Tax AppealNo.63/LKW/2016. 3. An amount of Rs.63,03,340/- is covered by the NotificationCirculation No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 which provides alimit of one crore in filing of appeal in the High Court. 4. Since the amount is below one crore, the appeal is consignedto record. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 4.1.2024Shubhankar

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.