Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/15/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Iapl/15/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Aligarh v. Smt. Manju Agarwal

High Court 27 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/15/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Aligarh v. Smt. Manju Agarwal
Date of order
27 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/15/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Aligarh v. Smt. Manju Agarwal, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular No.3 of2018 of F.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 15 of 2014 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax, AligarhRespondent :- Smt. Manju AgarwalCounsel for Appellant :- S.C.,Piyush Agrawal,S.S.C. I.T.Counsel for Respondent :- Suyash Agarwal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Heard Shri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Suyash Agarwal,learned counsel for the respondent. Shri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for thedepartment states that the tax effect involvedin this appeal is below the monetary limit. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular No.3 of2018 of F. No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board ofDirect Taxes dated 11.07.2018. Order Date :- 27.10.2018 sushama
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan