Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/152/2018 Of Tina Gupta v. The Commi...

Iapl/152/2018 Of Tina Gupta v. The Commissioner Income Tax And Another

High Court 11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/152/2018 Of Tina Gupta v. The Commissioner Income Tax And Another
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/152/2018 Of Tina Gupta v. The Commissioner Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: (ii) Whether the ITAT was correct in not complying with the directions of theHon'ble Court in its true spirit rather passing the remand order in a cursorymanner ?" The records were summoned, which have been produced.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Court No. - 35Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 152 of 2018Appellant :- Tina GuptaRespondent :- The Commissioner Income Tax And AnotherCounsel for Appellant :- Suyash AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,Manish Goyal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned Counsel for the appellantand Sri Manish Goyal, learned Counsel for the respondent-department. This is an assessee's appeal under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the judgement and order dated01.06.2018 for the Assessment Year 1997-98. The questions oflaw sought to be answered are hereunder:- "(i) Whether the ITAT in the remand proceeding was correct to hold that noticeu/s 148 bears assessment year on the basis of self attested documents filed bydepartment representative without summoning the assessment record ? (ii) Whether the ITAT was correct in not complying with the directions of theHon'ble Court in its true spirit rather passing the remand order in a cursorymanner ?" The records were summoned, which have been produced. The records have been perused by both parties as well as by theCourt. The record supports the findings recorded by theTribunal in paragraph no.3.2 of the order, which says that theassessment year 1997-98 was clearly mentioned in the noticein dispute. Therefore, it cannot be said that the notice issued to theassessee under Section 148 of the Act was defective. The orderof the Tribunal is upheld. The questions of law are answeredin favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Order Date :- 11.2.2019S.P.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan