Case Law › High Court › Iapl/168/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Iapl/168/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Kanpur v. M/S Model Tanners India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 16 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisdb_16012018

Parties

Date of order

16 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/168/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Kanpur v. M/S Model Tanners India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 168 of 2015 Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax KanpurRespondent :- M/S Model Tanners India Pvt. Ltd.Counsel for Appellant :- Piyush Agarwal,Bharat Ji AgrawalCounsel for Respondent :- Nishant Mishra,K.D.Vyas Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Sri Shubham Agarwal, learned counsel forthe department states that in view of the newcirculars issued by the Government of India,the tax effect involved in this appeal is belowmonetary limit. Sri Nishant Mishra, learnedcounsel for the respondent is present. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the CircularNos.17/2019 of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),dated8.8.2019andF.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ,dated20.8.2019 Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes. Order Date :- 16.10.2019V.S.Singh

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.