Iapl/169/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Moradabad v. Prathma Bank Moradabad
High Court
16 Aug 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/169/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Moradabad v. Prathma Bank Moradabad
Date of order
16 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Iapl/169/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Moradabad v. Prathma Bank Moradabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 169 of 2017
Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax MoradabadRespondent :- Prathma Bank MoradabadCounsel for Appellant :- Praveen Kumar,S.S.C. I.T.Counsel for Respondent :- Piyush Kaushik,Archit Mehrotra,Piyush Kaushik
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for theRevenue and learned counsel for the assessee.
At the outset, it has been stated by the Revenue thatassessee has already opted the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwash Act, 2020.
In view of that settlement reached and the certificatehaving been granted to the assessee under the aforesaidscheme, the appeal has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made, the appeal is dismissedas infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021
A.Kr.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue