Case Law › High Court › Iapl/172/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Iapl/172/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd

High Court 16 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisdb_16012018

Parties

Date of order

16 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/172/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the circular no.03 of2018 of F No 279/Misc.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 172 of 2013 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii KanpurRespondent :- M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd.Counsel for Appellant :- Gaurav Mahajan,S.S.C. I.T.Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal,Shalini Goyal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel forthe appellant and Shri Ashish Bansal, learnedcounsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent states that thetax effect involved in this appeal is below themonetary limit. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the circular no.03 of2018 of F No 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt),Government of India Ministry of FinanceDepartment of Revenue Central Board DirectTaxes, New Delhi the 11th July, 2018. Order Date :- 16.8.2018 S.P.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.