Iapl/215/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. M/S Tirupati Lpg Industries Ltd. Delhi
High Court
31 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/215/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. M/S Tirupati Lpg Industries Ltd. Delhi
Date of order
31 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Iapl/215/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. M/S Tirupati Lpg Industries Ltd. Delhi, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The substantial question of law onwhich the appeal has been admitted is quoted hereunder:- "Whether upon facts and circumstances of case the ITAT was correct in law inholding that provision of Section 80IC of I.T.Act 1961 allowed existence ofmultiple "initial assessment years" and consequently deduc...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellant. No one hascared to appear on behalf of the assessee.
This is an appeal filed by the department under Section 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-11 against an orderof the Tribunal dated 10.02.2016. The substantial question of law onwhich the appeal has been admitted is quoted hereunder:-
"Whether upon facts and circumstances of case the ITAT was correct in law inholding that provision of Section 80IC of I.T.Act 1961 allowed existence ofmultiple "initial assessment years" and consequently deduction @ 100% ofprofit where, it was otherwise allowable @ 30% only."
We have heard the counsel for the appellant at length and also perusedthe entire material on record.
There is no fact on disputes. The assessee was claiming a deductionunder Section 80 IC of the Act for making expansion during the year2004-05. The Tribunal while examining the matter has correctly come toan end that the benefit granted under the provisions of Section 80 ICcould not extend beyond a period of ten years.
While discussing the matter, the Tribunal has examined the matter tohold that while the initial assessment year during the ten years periodcould be even once, twice or thrice but ultimately the deduction wouldnot extend beyond the period of ten years.
Such being the case, law has been correctly applied, we see no reasonto interfere in the order passed by the Tribunal.
The question of law is, therefore, answered in favour of the assesseeand against the department.
The appeal is dismissed. No costs.
Order Date :- 31.1.2019S.P.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.