Iapl/223/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Varanasi v. Shri Gopal Pandey
High Court
08 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/223/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Varanasi v. Shri Gopal Pandey
Date of order
08 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Iapl/223/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Varanasi v. Shri Gopal Pandey, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 223 of 2016
Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax VaranasiRespondent :- Shri Gopal Pandey Prop. M/S Om Transport Co.BhadohiCounsel for Appellant :- Manu Ghildyal,Manu Ghildyal,S.S.C.I.T.Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for the revenue andSri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for the assessee.
The present appeal filed by the revenue arises from the orderdated 5.5.2016 passed in ITA No.266/Alld/2015 (A.Y. 2010-11)by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad 'CircuitBench' at Varanasi.
At the outset, learned counsel for the revenue states thatpursuant to the order of the Tribunal, certain order has beenpassed by the assessing authority. In the changed circumstances,the revenue does not wish to press the present appeal.
Learned counsel for the assessee has no objection.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 8.9.2021M. Tariq
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue