Iapl/225/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Euro Footwear Ltd
High Court
01 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/225/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Euro Footwear Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Iapl/225/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Euro Footwear Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Sri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for therespondent states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.03 of 2018 of F No279/Misc.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 225 of 2007
Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii KanpurRespondent :- M/S Euro Footwear Ltd.Counsel for Appellant :- Shubham Agarwal,C.S.C.,S.S.C. I.T.Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Shri Subham Agarwal, learned counsel for
the appellant and Sri Ashish Bansal, learnedcounsel for the respondent.
Sri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for therespondent states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.03 of 2018 of F No279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt), Government ofIndia Ministry of Finance Department ofRevenue Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhithe 11th July, 2018. Order Date :- 1.8.2018prateek
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue