Case Law › High Court › Iapl/233/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Iapl/233/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Super House Leathers Ltd. 150-Ft. Road Jajmau Kanpur

High Court 27 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisdb_16012018

Parties

Date of order

27 Feb 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/233/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Super House Leathers Ltd. 150-Ft. Road Jajmau Kanpur, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Shri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for therespondent states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.21 of 2015 of CIT (A&J),CBDT, New Delhi.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 233 of 2011 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Kanpur Respondent :- M/S Super House Leathers Ltd. 150-Ft. Road, Jajmau, KanpurCounsel for Appellant :- Shambhu Chopra (S.C.),Gaurav Mahajan,S.S.C.I.T. Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Shri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for therespondent states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.21 of 2015 of CIT (A&J),CBDT, New Delhi. Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learned Counsel for thedepartment is present. Order Date :- 27.2.2018S.P.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.