Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/25/2018 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Iapl/25/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Radhey Shyam Buildcon Pvt Ltd

High Court 18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/25/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Radhey Shyam Buildcon Pvt Ltd
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/25/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Radhey Shyam Buildcon Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 25 of 2018 Appellant :- Principal Commissioner Of Income TaxRespondent :- Radhey Shyam Buildcon Pvt LtdCounsel for Appellant :- Praveen KumarCounsel for Respondent :- Abhinav Mehrotra Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counselfor the appellant and Sri Abhinay Mehrotra,learned counsel for the respondent. Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for thedepartment, states that in view of the newcirculars issued by the Government of India,the tax effect involved in this appeal is belowmonetary limit. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the CircularNos.17/2019 of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),dated8.8.2019andF.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ,dated20.8.2019 Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes. Order Date :- 18.10.2019Sachin
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan