Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/256/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Iapl/256/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Alld v. Abc Industries Nakahara Mirzapur

High Court 18 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/256/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Alld v. Abc Industries Nakahara Mirzapur
Date of order
18 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/256/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Alld v. Abc Industries Nakahara Mirzapur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 256 of 2013 Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income Tax Alld.Respondent :- Abc Industries Nakahara MirzapurCounsel for Appellant :- Govind Krishna S.C. It,Gaurav Mahajan,Piyush Agrawal,S.S.C. I.T.Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal,S.K. Garg Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel forthe Department states that in view of the newcirculars issued by the Government of India,the tax effect involved in this appeal is belowmonetary limit. Sri Ashish Bansal, learnedcounsel for the respondent is present. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the CircularNos.17/2019 of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),dated8.8.2019andF.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ,dated20.8.2019 Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes. Order Date :- 18.9.2019V.S.Singh
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan