Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/269/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Iapl/269/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iikanpur v. M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/269/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iikanpur v. M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/269/2015 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iikanpur v. M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITATwas justified in law in confirming the order of CIT (A) in respect ofaddition of Rs.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed in the sameterms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 269 of 2015 Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-IikanpurRespondent :- M/S Rahman Exports Pvt. Ltd.Counsel for Appellant :- Ashok Kumar,Shubham Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal,Shalini Goel,Shubham Agrawal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard Sri Shubhan Agarwal, learned counsel forthe department and Sri Ashish Bansal, learnedcounsel for the assessee. This appeal under Section 260A of the IncomeTax, 1961(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') hasbeen filed by the department against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LucknowBench, "B", Lucknow dated 12.06.2015 for theassessment year 2007-08 raising followingquestions of law. "B. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITATwas justified in law in confirming the order of CIT (A) in respect ofaddition of Rs. 57,07,130/- made u/s. 92 of the I.T. Act on the basis oforder of TPO, who had calculated Transfer pricing on the basis of existingdata available on record?" This question has already been answered by thisCourt in favour of the assessee and against thedepartment in connected Income Tax AppealNo.7 of 2017. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed in the sameterms. Order Date :- 11.1.2018Arvind
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan