Iapl/30/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Lucknow v. M/S U.p. Asbestos Lucknow
High Court
04 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cishclko
Parties
Iapl/30/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Lucknow v. M/S U.p. Asbestos Lucknow
Date of order
04 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2013-14
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Iapl/30/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Lucknow v. M/S U.p. Asbestos Lucknow, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Court No. - 2
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 30 of 2017
Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii LucknowRespondent :- M/S U.P. Asbestos LucknowCounsel for Appellant :- Manish MishraCounsel for Respondent :- Pradeep Agrawal
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Heard Sri Kushagra Dixit, learned counsel for the appellant andSri Pradeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the tax effectpertaining to AY 2012-13 is Rs.1,32,06,844/- and for AY 2013-14 is Rs.1,12,48,694, which is covered by a Circular of theGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance dated 17.09.2024,therefore, counsel for the appellant seeks permission towithdraw this appeal.
Permission for withdrawal is granted. The appeal is withdrawnfor the reasons aforesaid.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.)(Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 4.3.2025Saurabh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue