Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/303/2017 Of Principal Commissioner...

Iapl/303/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Meerut v. M/S Girnar Textiles

High Court 11 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/303/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Meerut v. M/S Girnar Textiles
Date of order
11 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/303/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Meerut v. M/S Girnar Textiles, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal fails and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 303 of 2017 Appellant :- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax MeerutRespondent :- M/S Girnar TextilesCounsel for Appellant :- Manu Ghildyal Counsel for Respondent :- Pratik Chandra,Saubhagya Agarwal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. (Delivered by Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.) Present appeal has been filed under Section 260-A of the Income tax Act, 1961 (hereinafterreferred to as the Act) against the judgment andorder dated 23.3.2017 in ITA No. 4334/Del/2015(Assessment Year 2008-09) passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "E"New Delhi. The appeal has been admitted on thefollowing substantial question of law: "Whether the Ld. ITAT was correct in law in confirming theorder of CIT (A) wherein the consequential order passed by theAO u/s 143(3)/263 was deleted on the ground that order passedu/s 263 has already been set aside and no material was placedon record to demonstrate the Tribunals' order setting aside therevisional order has been modified or reversed by in anymanner by the Hon'ble High Court overlooking the fact thatappeal of revenue has been admitted before the Hon'ble HighCourt, Allahabad against the order dated 30.3.2015 of theITAT?" We have heard Sri Manu Ghildiyal, learnedcounsel for the Revenue and Ms. SaubhagyaAgarwal, learned counsel appearing for therespondent assessee. A preliminary objection has been raised by thecounsel for the respondent about themaintainability of the appeal in view of theCircular No. 3 of 2018 of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt), Government ofIndia, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes dated11.7.2018. On perusal of the record it revealed that thepresent appeal has been filed only assailing thedeletion of Rs. 41,12,950/-. In view of the aforesaid fact that the amount ofRs. 41,12,950/- is much below the monetary limitprescribed in the aforementioned Circular, hencethe present appeal is not maintainable. The appealis liable to be dismissed in view of the CircularNo.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018. The appeal fails and is dismissed. Order Date :- 11.3.2019samz
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan