Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/352/2017 Of Principal Commissioner...

Iapl/352/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Shri Kishore Kumar Vakil

High Court 22 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/352/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Shri Kishore Kumar Vakil
Date of order
22 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/352/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Shri Kishore Kumar Vakil, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the Circular of Ministryof Finance dated 11.07.2018 as modified byF.N.390 /Misc. /116 /2017 -JC/, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Boardof Indirect Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 352 of 2017 Appellant :- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax CentralRespondent :- Shri Kishore Kumar VakilCounsel for Appellant :- Praveen Kumar Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel forthe appellant and Shri S.K. Garg and Shri AshishBansal, learned counsel for the respondent -assessee. Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for theDepartment states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit ofRs.50,00,000/-. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the Circular of Ministryof Finance dated 11.07.2018 as modified byF.N.390 /Misc. /116 /2017 -JC/, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Boardof Indirect Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell). Order Date :- 22.1.2019Amit Mishra
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan