Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/411/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Iapl/411/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd

High Court 05 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/411/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/411/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Shri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel for thedepartment states that the tax effect involvedin this appeal is below the monetary limit,therefore, this appeal is dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the circular no.21 of2015 of CIT (A&J), CBDT, New Delhi.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 411 of 2010 Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income Tax And AnotherRespondent :- M/S Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd.Counsel for Appellant :- S.S.C. I.T.,Manu GhildyalCounsel for Respondent :- Vinod Kumar Rastogi Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Shri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel for thedepartment states that the tax effect involvedin this appeal is below the monetary limit,therefore, this appeal is dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the circular no.21 of2015 of CIT (A&J), CBDT, New Delhi. Order Date :- 5.3.2018pks
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan