Iapl/500/2008 Of Commissioner Income Tax v. Shri. Ramandeep Singh
High Court
26 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/500/2008 Of Commissioner Income Tax v. Shri. Ramandeep Singh
Date of order
26 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Iapl/500/2008 Of Commissioner Income Tax v. Shri. Ramandeep Singh, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular No.17/2019of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.), dated8.8.2019 Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Boardof Direct Taxes Judicial Section.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 500 of 2008
Appellant :- Commissioner Income Tax
Respondent :- Shri. Ramandeep Singh
Counsel for Appellant :- Krishna Agarwal I.T.Dept
Counsel for Respondent :- Harshul Bhatnagar,Suyash Agarwal
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Krishna Agarwal, learned Counsel for
the appellant and Sri Suyash Agarwal, learnedCounsel for the assessee.
Learned counsel for the assessee states that in
view of the circular issued by the Government ofIndia, the tax effect involved in this appeal isbelow monetary limit.
This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not
maintainable in view of the Circular No.17/2019of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.), dated8.8.2019 Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Boardof Direct Taxes Judicial Section.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019
S.P.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue