Case Law › High Court › Iapl v. M/S R.r. Perfumer Pvt. Ltd. Kanp...

Iapl v. M/S R.r. Perfumer Pvt. Ltd. Kanpur Nagar

High Court 20 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisdb_16012018

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl v. M/S R.r. Perfumer Pvt. Ltd. Kanpur Nagar, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the Circular ofMinistry of Finance dated 11.07.2018, asmodified by F.N.390 /Misc. /116 /2017 -JC/,Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue,Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs(Judicial Cell).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 50 of 2017 Appellant :- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Kanpur NagarRespondent :- M/S R.R. Perfumer Pvt. Ltd. Kanpur NagarCounsel for Appellant :- Krishna AgarawalCounsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Shri Krishna Agarwal, learned counsel for theappellant - Department states that the taxeffect involved in this appeal is below themonetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/-. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the Circular ofMinistry of Finance dated 11.07.2018, asmodified by F.N.390 /Misc. /116 /2017 -JC/,Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue,Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs(Judicial Cell). Order Date :- 20.2.2019Amit Mishra

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.