Case Law › High Court › Iapl/513/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Iapl/513/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Lohia Starlingter Ltd. Kanpur

High Court 03 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisdb_16012018

Parties

Date of order

03 Oct 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/513/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Kanpur v. M/S Lohia Starlingter Ltd. Kanpur, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular No.3 of2018 of F.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 513 of 2009 Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, KanpurRespondent :- M/S Lohia Starlingter Ltd., KanpurCounsel for Appellant :- C.S.C.It,Piyush KumarCounsel for Respondent :- Shakeel Ahmad Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Heard Shri Piyush Agrawal, learned counselfor the appellant and Shri Shakeel Ahmad,learned counsel for the respondent. Shri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for thedepartment states that the tax effect involvedin this appeal is below the monetary limit. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular No.3 of2018 of F. No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board ofDirect Taxes dated 11.07.2018. Order Date :- 3.10.2018 pks

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.