Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/557/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Iapl/557/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Allied Leather Finishers Pvt. Ltd

High Court 04 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/557/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Allied Leather Finishers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
04 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/557/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Allied Leather Finishers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the Circular No.3 of2018 of F.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 557 of 2009 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income TaxRespondent :- M/S Allied Leather Finishers Pvt. Ltd.Counsel for Appellant :- S.S.C. I.T.,Praveen KumarCounsel for Respondent :- S.K. Garg,A. Bansal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for therespondent. Learned counsel for the department states that thetax effect involved in this appeal is below themonetary limit. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as notmaintainable in view of the Circular No.3 of2018 of F. No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.),Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of DirectTaxes dated 11.07.2018. Order Date :- 4.10.2018S.P.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan