Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/62/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Iapl/62/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Meerut v. M/S Raj Laxmi Charitable Trust

High Court 14 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/62/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Meerut v. M/S Raj Laxmi Charitable Trust
Date of order
14 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/62/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Meerut v. M/S Raj Laxmi Charitable Trust, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular Nos.17/2019of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.), dated8.8.2019 and F.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ,dated 20.8.2019 Government of India, Ministryof Finance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 62 of 2011 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax MeerutRespondent :- M/S Raj Laxmi Charitable TrustCounsel for Appellant :- Krishna AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- R.R.Agrawal,Suyash Agrawal Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Shri Manish Goel, learned counsel for the department, states that in view of the newcirculars issued by the Government of India, thetax effect involved in this appeal is belowmonetary limit. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular Nos.17/2019of F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.), dated8.8.2019 and F.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ,dated 20.8.2019 Government of India, Ministryof Finance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard of Direct Taxes. Order Date :- 14.11.2019AKJ
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan