Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/68/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Iapl/68/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Obeteee P Ltd. Mirzapur

High Court 01 Oct 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/68/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Obeteee P Ltd. Mirzapur
Date of order
01 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Iapl/68/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Obeteee P Ltd. Mirzapur, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The above position being admitted to the parties, thepresent appeal is dismissed for the reason of thedisputed tax being below the prescribed monetary limit Order Date :- 1.10.2021A.Kr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 68 of 2013 Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income TaxRespondent :- M/S Obeteee P Ltd. MirzapurCounsel for Appellant :- S.S.C. I.T.,Gaurav Mahajan,Piyush Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- S.K. Garg,Ashish Bansal Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Heard Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for therevenue and Sri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for theassessee. Present appeal has been filed by the revenue underSection 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against theorder dated 23.11.2012 passed by Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Allahabad in ITA No.249/Alld/2011 (A.Y. 2005-06). At the outset, learned counsel for the revenue fairly statedthat the dispute involved in the present appeal is belowthe prescribed monetary limit set by the CBDT. The above position being admitted to the parties, thepresent appeal is dismissed for the reason of thedisputed tax being below the prescribed monetary limit Order Date :- 1.10.2021A.Kr.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan