Iapl/69/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Baghel And Company Sonebhadra
High Court
18 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/69/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Baghel And Company Sonebhadra
Date of order
18 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Iapl/69/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Baghel And Company Sonebhadra, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for theappellant, states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.03 of 2018 F No279/Misc.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 69 of 2013
Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income TaxRespondent :- M/S Baghel & Company, SonebhadraCounsel for Appellant :- S.S.C. I.T.,Gaurav MahajanCounsel for Respondent :- Rajendra Prasad Agrawal
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel forthe appellant, and Shri R.P. Agrawal, learnedcounsel for the respondent.
Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for theappellant, states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.03 of 2018 F No279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt), Government ofIndia Ministry of Finance Department ofRevenue Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhithe 11th July, 2018.
Order Date :- 18.7.2018MVS Chauhan/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue