Case LawHigh Court › Iapl/80/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Iapl/80/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Noida Golf Course Society Regd

High Court 18 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Iapl/80/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Noida Golf Course Society Regd
Date of order
18 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Iapl/80/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Noida Golf Course Society Regd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for theappellant, states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.03 of 2018 F No279/Misc.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 80 of 2013 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income TaxRespondent :- M/S Noida Golf Course Society (Regd.)Counsel for Appellant :- S.S.C. I.T.,Gaurav MahajanCounsel for Respondent :- Vishnu Sharma,Vivek Pratap Singh Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. Heard Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel forthe appellant, and Shri Vivek Pratap Singh,learned counsel for the respondent. Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for theappellant, states that the tax effect involved inthis appeal is below the monetary limit, therefore,this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable inview of the circular no.03 of 2018 F No279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt), Government ofIndia Ministry of Finance Department ofRevenue Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhithe 11th July, 2018. Order Date :- 18.7.2018MVS Chauhan/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan