Ibrahim A Katthawala v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Dcit), Circle
High Court
06 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Ibrahim A Katthawala v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Dcit), Circle
Date of order
06 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ibrahim A Katthawala v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Dcit), Circle, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5348/2022
Ibrahim A Katthawala S/o Abbas Hussain Katthawala, KatthawalaBuilding, Bhimganj Mandi, Kota Junction, Kota 324002,Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (DCIT), Circle-2, KotaHaving Its Address At Office Of The Deputy Commissioner OfIncome Tax Circle-2, Kota, Central Revenue Building RawatBhata Road, Kota Rajasthan Through Deputy Commissioner OfIncome Tax.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mrs. Parinitoo Jain, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
06/04/2022
Mrs. Parinitoo Jain, learned counsel enters appearance onbehalf of the respondent. Advance copy of the petition has beensupplied to learned counsel for the respondent.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner uponinstructions would submit that till date no order of assessment hasbeen passed by the Assessing Authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that theissue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it hasbeen put to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decisionrendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer,
Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batchof petitions) where the notices issued under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid andimpermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, forthe reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in theaforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition isallowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Karan/96
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.