In I.c. Sanghal & Others v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission & Another, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 463 of 2008 (M/S)
I.C. Sanghal & others.
……… Petitioners
Versus
The Income Tax Settlement Commission & another.
……….. Respondents
Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioners.
Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J.
Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that because of intervening developments the writ petition has become infructuous. He seeks to withdraw the same on this ground.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 08.04.2009
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.