Icici Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of
High Court
31 Mar 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Icici Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of
Date of order
31 Mar 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Icici Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
WRIT PETITION (Lodg.) NO. 838 OF 2004.
WRIT PETITION (Lodg.) NO. 838 OF 2004.
WRIT PETITION (Lodg.) NO. 838 OF 2004.
ICICI Bank Ltd. ..Petitioner.
vs.
Deputy Commissioner of
Income, Range 3(1), Mumbai & ors. ..Respondents.
Shri S.E. Dastur, Senior Counsel with S.J. Mehta and
Ms. A. Vissanji for tehe petitioner.
Shri B.M. Chatterjee with A.S. Rao for the
respondents.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 31-3-2005.
DATED: 31-3-2005.
DATED: 31-3-2005.
P.C.
1. Office is directed to register this petition
as the same is placed before us on lodging number in
view of the urgency.
2. On the motion made by the learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner, he is allowed to
withdraw this petition, considering the letter dated
28.3.2005 issued by the office of the Commissioner of
Income-tax-3, Mumbai, Shri P.K. Chopra, copy of which
is taken on record. Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
********
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.